An “Osaka Strip” concept should be considered, for a world-class casino gaming hub in Japan with multiple venues, to compete with the likes of the Las Vegas Strip in Nevada and the Cotai Strip in Macau.
That is the suggestion in a white paper on Japan’s nascent casino industry – an executive summary of which was issued on Wednesday – by Global Market Advisors LLC (GMA).
“GMA would suggest if tourism is one of the main reasons for IR [integrated resort] expansion, as it was in Singapore, that one of the sites, such as Yumeshima Island in Osaka, be considered to host multiple IRs on a single site,” said the consultancy, referring to an artificial island (pictured) in Osaka Bay.
An April report from the Paris-based OECD – the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development – said that while growth in Japan’s per capita output had picked up pace, “more needs to be done for Japan to overcome two key challenges – a record high government debt ratio and an accelerating decline in its working-age population”.
An “Osaka Strip” hub had the potential to generate initially nearly US$11 billion in annual gaming revenue, by the year 2025, said GMA. Approximately 47 percent of it was projected to come from “international travellers”, added the consultancy.
In 2016 Macau’s casino gross gaming revenue was the equivalent of nearly US$28 billion. The split between casino GGR from Greater China customers and that generated by people from further afield is not covered by the publicly issued Macau government data. But in terms of visitor arrivals, Macau is overwhelmingly a Chinese market. In 2016, close to 28 million – or approximately 90 percent of the 30.95-million annual tally of all of Macau visitors – came from the Greater China market, namely mainland China, Hong Kong and Taiwan.
The GMA document said, referring to Japan’s casino experiment: “Three or more operators would create critical mass and a full tourist destination, allowing the Osaka Strip market to compete with destinations such as Las Vegas, Macau and Singapore.”
Previously much of the narrative in public discussion regarding potential venues for Japan casino resorts has been not about a single hub with multiple resorts, but about cities and prefectures in the country – including Tokyo, Osaka and Yokohama – competing against each other for the perceived economic benefits of such projects.
GMA noted: “If this [hub] concept were adopted, GMA would still advocate that additional regional concessions be allowed to further stimulate tourism and economic growth.”
The consultancy estimated that – based on current circumstances – 2023 would be the earliest that a Japanese gaming resort could open.
GMA – a U.S.-based consultant to the casino gaming, hotel and airline industries, with offices in Taiwan and Thailand – said it had developed a series of market models that took into account sites currently under discussion. It said that under the models, the value of a Japanese casino gaming market was estimated to range from US$12.5 billion via two large resorts – in Osaka (non-Strip model) and Yokohama – by the year 2025, to US$24.2 billion for what it termed a “full build out” in six different locations – namely Tokyo, the “Osaka Strip”, Sasebo, Sendai, Yokohama and Hokkaido – by the year 2030. Another scenario – involving sites in Osaka (non-Strip model), Tokyo, Sasebo and Hokkaido – anticipated generation of US$14.3 billion in revenue by 2025.
“While the number of sites has not officially been determined, it is widely viewed that there will be an initial one to three IRs in the first round of RFPs [request for proposals], with a second round not beginning until after initial IRs have opened and demonstrated their benefits to Japan,” said GMA.
The consultancy estimates Japan’s process for deciding on the location of resorts will be completed by the third quarter of 2018. This would be followed by the request for proposal stage, with the winners chosen by the third quarter of 2019, it said.
“GMA anticipates that this will be the most competitive RFP process since Singapore awarded its two IRs over 10 years ago,” stated the summary.
“Based on discussions with local constituents,” bidders would be “well advised to have a local partner as part of their overall project,” added the consultancy.
“The Singapore and Nevada regulatory structures will serve as a baseline for most of Japan’s regulatory framework,” the organisation further stated. But it noted: “GMA has not identified any research that indicates that entry levies reduce problem gambling, and some industry experts have suggested that it encourages problematic ‘chasing’ behaviour” among some casino customers.
GMA said in the white paper executive summary that Clairvest Group Inc, a Toronto, Canada-based private-equity management firm; and U.S.-based casino operator Hard Rock International Inc, had sponsored the white paper.
On January 30, Hard Rock International announced that Edward Tracy, a former boss of Macau casino operator Sands China Ltd, had been appointed chief executive of Hard Rock International’s newly announced Japan division.
In February, Hard Rock International chairman James Allen said the group was interested in developing a joint venture casino resort project in Japan in collaboration with local partners.
Jul 17, 2018A total of 233 requests for exclusion from Macau casinos were received by the authorities in the first half of 2018, up from 179 exclusion bids in the first six months of 2017. There were 200...
Jul 16, 2018
Jul 16, 2018
"The President [Rodrigo Duterte] had already decided and announced that no construction of a casino on Boracay will be allowed”
Secretary Eduardo Año
Officer-in-charge at the Philippine Department of Local and Interior Government