Land and Buildings Investment Management, a Connecticut-based hedge fund, said MGM Resorts International should split into a separate real estate investment trust (REIT) and hotel-management company. It is also suggesting “monetising” Macau-based MGM China Holdings Ltd, which owns and operates the MGM Macau and is building the US$3-billion MGM Cotai.
The fund values MGM Resorts at US$33 a share, more than 50 percent above the current price, and says it could reach US$55, according to a presentation published on Tuesday.
“Land and Buildings believes MGM’s high-quality real estate portfolio is substantially undervalued in the public markets,” said hedge fund manager Jonathan Litt.
“We have been attempting to work collaboratively with MGM management to find an optimal corporate structure for the company and believe the proposed REIT conversion detailed in the presentation released today will maximise shareholder value while minimising costs,” he added in a statement.
Mr Litt recommends that MGM International sell those of its U.S. casinos located outside Nevada. He added that MGM China could take advantage of tax credits the parent company has and pay a special dividend.
“In Land and Buildings’ view, spinning out or monetising MGM China would focus investors on attractive domestic trends,” the fund said in its presentation. “A range of external factors position Macau to have significant value as headwinds dissipate, which could result in an attractive long-term opportunity,” it added.
Proceeds could be used to pay down about US$5 billion of debt maturing through 2016, it said.
MGM Resorts rose 10.6 percent to US$21.74 at the close in New York, bringing the stock back into positive territory for the year.
Analysts at Japanese brokerage Nomura said they agreed that MGM Resorts’ real estate is undervalued, but did not agree with Mr Litt’s suggestion for a special dividend from MGM China.
“We agree with most of the proposal except for a US$2.6 billion special dividend from MGM China, of which MGM REIT would receive US$1.3 billion due to its 51 percent ownership. MGM China’s leverage would increase to more than 6 times in 2016, which would be too leveraged, in our view, given the prospect of lower ROICs [returns on invested capital] in a slower-growth environment,” said analysts Harry Curtis, Kelvin Wong and Brian Dobson in a note on Tuesday.
“Backing out the special dividend would lower the equity value of MGM REIT to [about] US$23, or a combined value of [about] US$30 to US$31 per share, still offering considerable upside from today’s price,” they added.
The Nomura team said it views the proposal “as an opening round of activism”.
“For years we have estimated similar value for MGM and believe this public announcement increases the pressure on MGM to consider the strategy sooner rather than later,” the analysts said.
Exposure to Macau helped MGM Resorts in recent years, as Las Vegas was hard hit both in gambling and hotel revenues amid the financial crisis. But gross gaming revenue in Macau has fallen for nine consecutive months since June, which has dragged down casino stocks listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.
For full year 2014, MGM Resorts global net revenues were US$10.1 billion, a 3-percent increase over 2013. MGM China’s net revenue was US$3.3 billion of that total, a 1-percent decrease from 2013.
In September 2012, Mr Litt issued a paper suggesting Las Vegas Sands Corp could see the then value of its shares almost double if it spun off its shopping mall and hotel properties into two real estate investment trusts.
MGM Resorts chief executive Jim Murren said on a fourth quarter earnings call last month that the company would not exclude the REIT option.
“The concept of converting gaming assets to REITs is not a new one. It was very actively discussed before the recession. And more recently, the dialogue is there again. We look at this all the time,” Mr Murren said.
He added: “We believe that our assets are undervalued around the portfolio of our assets. We believe that as we’re working for the shareholders, we should explore every opportunity as they come across our desk. And so I’d have to say, there’s nothing definitive. There’s nothing to report, but we do look at this type of corporate transactions”.
David Bain of U.S.-based brokerage Sterne Agee said in a note on Tuesday that some of Land and Buildings’ equity multiple assumptions “seem lofty” and that asset sales and reworking MGM China leverage and dividend policy “seem at least complicated”.
But the analyst said the proposal “highlights the potential value of MGM’s land and operating portfolio versus current trading levels”.
“MGM has stated previously it is open to a REIT structure. However, MGM has looked at the REIT structure both internally and externally for years and we doubt this particular proposal carries significantly new elements to what it has reviewed before,” Mr Bain added.
On Tuesday, Land and Buildings – owner of less than 1 percent of MGM Resorts outstanding shares – announced its intention to nominate four directors to the board of the U.S.-based casino operator.
Aside from Mr Litt, the nominees include: Matthew Hart, former president of Hilton Hotels Corp; Richard Kincaid, former chief executive of Equity Office Properties Trust; and Marc Weisman, an investor, lawyer and former investment banker.
Investors are said to like REITs because they must pay out at least 90 percent of taxable earnings to shareholders as dividends, according to U.S. legislation. REITs don’t pay federal income taxes on those earnings in exchange.
Penn National Gaming Inc, a small Pennsylvania-based casino operator, boosted its stock price after spinning off its real estate into a REIT called Gaming and Leisure Properties Inc. Since Penn’s spinoff, Caesars Entertainment Corp and Pinnacle Entertainment Inc have announced plans to create REITs.
Sep 28, 2020A senior executive at China’s Internet-search provider Baidu Inc, has been detained by police in the mainland city of Hangzhou, in connection with an inquiry into alleged promotion of gambling...
Sep 28, 2020
Sep 28, 2020
”It will take many years, possibly three… to five years for… international visitor arrivals to return to 2019 pre-Covid-19 levels”
Chief executive of Singapore Tourism Board