• About Us
  • The Team
  • Newsletter
  • Advertise with Us
GGRAsia
  • Home
  • Macau
  • Philippines
  • Singapore
  • Japan
  • Rest of Asia
  • World
  • Industry Talk
  • Trends & Tech
  • CSR
Reading: MGM China says US$8mln reversal re liability in junket cases
Ad image
  • About Us
  • The Team
  • Newsletter
  • Advertise with Us
GGRAsia
  • Home
  • Macau
  • Philippines
  • Singapore
  • Japan
  • Rest of Asia
  • World
  • Industry Talk
  • Trends & Tech
  • CSR
Reading: MGM China says US$8mln reversal re liability in junket cases
Ad image
Search
  • Home
  • Macau
  • Philippines
  • Singapore
  • Japan
  • Rest of Asia
  • World
  • Industry Talk
  • Trends & Tech
  • CSR
GGRAsia > Newsletter > Newsletter 5 > MGM China says US$8mln reversal re liability in junket cases
Latest NewsMacauNewsletterNewsletter 5Top of the deck

MGM China says US$8mln reversal re liability in junket cases

Newsdesk Published September 9, 2022
Share
4 Min Read

Macau casino operator MGM China Holdings Ltd says it has made a reversal of HKD60.6 million (US$7.7 million) in the first half of 2022, regarding a HKD202.7-million liability recorded at end of December last year. The company said earlier this year that it could be liable for cash deposits individuals claim were placed with gambling junkets that had been working with the casino company, and not returned.

“During the six months ended June 30, 2022, the group reached a final settlement of certain litigations related to the group’s joint liability with gaming promoters and made a reversal of the liability recorded at December 31, 2021 of HKD60.6 million,” said the company in its interim report published on Thursday.

“The estimated possible financial loss arising from the remaining legal proceedings recognised as a liability amounts to HKD6.3 million at June 30, 2022,” it added.

Earlier this year, MGM China said it had been named as a defendant in three civil cases relating to cash allegedly placed with an aggregate of two junkets that had been active at its MGM Macau resort (pictured).

The plaintiffs had respectively claimed the junkets – known in Macau as gaming promoters – failed to honour the withdrawal of such cash deposits.

MGM China lost in February one of the cases at Macau’s Court of Final Appeal. It resulted in a liability in that matter amounting to HKD117 million, including a HKD80-million principal and accrued interest.

The earlier filing did not name the junket. Such gaming promoters require a licence from the Macau government.

The casino firm said it would be entitled to claim from the gaming promoter the reimbursement of the amount paid, in a separate lawsuit.

But it noted in its filing that “in light of the recent developments impacting” that particular junket’s activities, “it was predicted that the chance to recover the loss suffered through the payments to be made by the group, is remote”.

In all junket-deposit litigation cases faced by MGM China, the group had been sued “based solely on the joint liability of the concessionaire for the actions and conducts of the gaming promoters engaged by it at its casinos, as contemplated in article 29 of Administrative Regulation no. 6/2002, governing the licensing and activities of gaming promoters,” the firm said.

A November 2021 ruling by Macau’s Court of Final Appeal had held another Macau operator, Wynn Macau Ltd, to be a party liable to refund a HKD6-million deposit lodged with VIP gaming promoter Dore Entertainment Co Ltd.

According to recent statements by Macau gaming operators, the industry’s cooperation with Macau-licensed junkets was largely paused since the fourth quarter of 2021. That coincided with two high-profile figures in the local junket segment being detained on suspicion of facilitating illegal forms to gambling.

Macau’s revised gaming law – approved in June – states the joint liability that gaming concessionaires and gaming promoters must bear, regarding junket-generated VIP business. It includes that gaming concessionaires will have a duty to inform the city’s casino regulator of any matters that might potentially affect a junket’s ability to cover its loans or financing requirements.

Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Whatsapp Whatsapp LinkedIn Email Copy Link Print

Latest News

Melco Resorts mulls nightclub brand ‘dragon-i macau’ to complement its integrated resort biz
July 27, 2026
Mandatory staff retention could cut selling price for Pagcor casinos: law firm
July 27, 2026
Right non-gaming offer can aid Macau casino business even during stormy weekend: Citi
July 27, 2026

Most Popular

HeadlinesLatest NewsMacauNewsletterNewsletter 2

Sands China 2Q EBITDA miss ‘too large to ignore’ amid worst-ever VIP luck: analysts

July 23, 2026
HeadlinesLatest NewsNewsletterNewsletter 2Rest of Asia

Many players at S.Korea casinos may lose anonymity under proposed AML rule changes: industry sources

July 21, 2026
HeadlinesLatest NewsNewsletterNewsletter 5Rest of Asia

Two Jeju-casino card dealers charged in relation to alleged fraud against Chinese gamblers

July 22, 2026
HeadlinesLatest NewsMacauNewsletterNewsletter 2

Macau govt nods land-use changes for Wynn Palace expansion, including new hotel tower

July 22, 2026

Code of Ethics

Privacy Policy

Useful Links

Contact Us

Follow US
Copyright 2026 TEAM Publishing and Consultancy Ltd / All rights reserved
Sign up to our FREE Newsletter

Subscribe now and never miss our latest news!

Zero spam, unsubscribe at any time.