• About Us
  • The Team
  • Newsletter
  • Advertise with Us
GGRAsia
  • Home
  • Macau
  • Philippines
  • Singapore
  • Japan
  • Rest of Asia
  • World
  • Industry Talk
  • Trends & Tech
  • CSR
Reading: Civil claims not part of Levo Chan criminal case: court
Ad image
  • About Us
  • The Team
  • Newsletter
  • Advertise with Us
GGRAsia
  • Home
  • Macau
  • Philippines
  • Singapore
  • Japan
  • Rest of Asia
  • World
  • Industry Talk
  • Trends & Tech
  • CSR
Reading: Civil claims not part of Levo Chan criminal case: court
Ad image
Search
  • Home
  • Macau
  • Philippines
  • Singapore
  • Japan
  • Rest of Asia
  • World
  • Industry Talk
  • Trends & Tech
  • CSR
GGRAsia > Newsletter > Newsletter 2 > Civil claims not part of Levo Chan criminal case: court
Latest NewsMacauNewsletterNewsletter 2Top of the deck

Civil claims not part of Levo Chan criminal case: court

Newsdesk Published October 27, 2022
Share
2 Min Read

Macau’s Court of First Instance has decided not to include civil claims in the trial of gambling junket head Levo Chan Weng Lin (pictured in a file photo) and other defendants linked to junket brand Tak Chun. That was in order to expedite the handling of the criminal allegations, according to a decision from the court.

The information was reported on Wednesday by the Portuguese-language service of public broadcaster TDM. The report said the parties seeking damages were informed on Tuesday of the court’s decision.

The trial of Mr Chan and the other defendants is set to begin on December 5, according to the schedule published on the website of Macau’s Court of First Instance. Mr Chan has been in pre-trial detention since his arrest in late January.

Macau’s Public Prosecutions Office said in January that Mr Chan, the leader of Tak Chun, was suspected of illegal running of gambling operations and money laundering. In total, nine people have been indicted under the same criminal case.

A number of the city’s casino operators, as well as the Public Prosecutions Office on behalf of the Macau government, were seeking damages over losses allegedly caused by the defendants.

TDM reported that the court’s decision stated that the eventual value of the claim for civil damages was “compatible” with the “content of the criminal complaint”.

According to the report, Wynn Macau Ltd, Sands China Ltd, SJM Holdings Ltd, and MGM China Holdings Ltd were – via their locally-incorporated subsidiaries – claiming millions of U.S. dollars from the defendants.

A similar approach was taken in the proceedings related to the trial of Alvin Chau Cheok Wa and other defendants linked to the now-defunct Macau casino junket Suncity Group Ltd. In mid-September, the court handling that trial decided that criminal and civil proceedings should run separately.

Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Whatsapp Whatsapp LinkedIn Email Copy Link Print

Latest News

ETG specialist Interblock appoints Kay Oswald as CEO
July 21, 2026
‘Joyup’ is Light & Wonder’s happy evolution of its ‘Jin Ji Bao Xi’ slot series
July 21, 2026
Kangwon Land Inc promotes climate action campaign among staff
July 21, 2026

Most Popular

HeadlinesLatest NewsNewsletterNewsletter 2Trends & Tech

IGT ending its ETG business in 2027 as part of its focus on ‘core business priorities’

July 16, 2026
Latest NewsNewsletterNewsletter 5SingaporeTop of the deck

Some Singapore casino special employees suspected of gambling in breach of licensing conditions: Auditor-General

July 16, 2026
HeadlinesLatest NewsNewsletterNewsletter 1Singapore

Singapore’s Marina Bay Sands 2Q EBITDA likely down 5pct y-o-y: JP Morgan

July 15, 2026
HeadlinesLatest NewsMacauNewsletterNewsletter 1

Macau’s VIP baccarat revenue down 2.6pct y-o-y in 2Q, slot GGR grows 17pct

July 16, 2026

Code of Ethics

Privacy Policy

Useful Links

Contact Us

Follow US
Copyright 2026 TEAM Publishing and Consultancy Ltd / All rights reserved
Sign up to our FREE Newsletter

Subscribe now and never miss our latest news!

Zero spam, unsubscribe at any time.