• About Us
  • The Team
  • Newsletter
  • Advertise with Us
GGRAsia
  • Home
  • Macau
  • Philippines
  • Singapore
  • Japan
  • Rest of Asia
  • World
  • Industry Talk
  • Trends & Tech
  • CSR
Reading: LVS still eyeing a Korea casino via Busan: Tanasijevich
Ad image
  • About Us
  • The Team
  • Newsletter
  • Advertise with Us
GGRAsia
  • Home
  • Macau
  • Philippines
  • Singapore
  • Japan
  • Rest of Asia
  • World
  • Industry Talk
  • Trends & Tech
  • CSR
Reading: LVS still eyeing a Korea casino via Busan: Tanasijevich
Ad image
Search
  • Home
  • Macau
  • Philippines
  • Singapore
  • Japan
  • Rest of Asia
  • World
  • Industry Talk
  • Trends & Tech
  • CSR
GGRAsia > Newsletter > Newsletter 4 > LVS still eyeing a Korea casino via Busan: Tanasijevich
Latest NewsNewsletterNewsletter 4Rest of AsiaTop of the deck

LVS still eyeing a Korea casino via Busan: Tanasijevich

Newsdesk Published September 9, 2016
Share
4 Min Read

Global casino operator Las Vegas Sands Corp has again shown interest in having a casino resort in South Korea’s port city of Busan.

“The best location for [the] Sands group to invest in is Busan. We are willing to move in as soon as investment conditions are met,” said George Tanasijevich, in his role as managing director of global development for Las Vegas Sands, as quoted by the Korea Economic Daily newspaper.

The media outlet reported in June that unidentified “key members” from Las Vegas Sands had toured the Busan North Port area (pictured) that month. The delegation also reportedly held an investment strategy meeting with the Busan Metropolitan city government.

Mr Tanasijevich – who also serves as chief executive of Marina Bay Sands Pte Ltd, the operator of the group’s Singapore gaming resort – is responsible for Las Vegas Sands’ global development activities. Currently the group operates casinos in Singapore, Macau and in the United States.

He added in his latest published interview: “[Busan] has an unlimited growth potential for its location – lying between Japan and China – but is now suffering in obscurity due to lack of enough five-star hotels and exhibition and convention venues.”

The executive said Las Vegas Sands was willing to invest between KRW5 trillion (US$4.5 billion) and KRW12 trillion in Busan.

“If Busan really aims to become an international tourism city, we can do so by enlisting investors, just like Singapore, that raised its profile as a premier tourist destination by increasing foreign tourist numbers from 9.2 million in 2009 to 15 million in 2015, and creating 46,000 jobs in the process,” Mr Tanasijevich was quoted as saying.

Development of a casino resort in Busan could be a “catalyst to tourism” if pursued in partnership with “international experienced operators”, said Glenn McCartney, assistant professor of hospitality and gaming at the University of Macau. He made the comments at the 1st Global Busan Tourism Forum held in the city in June.

Mr Tanasijevich reiterated in his latest comments that – for such a casino resort investment to be viable – locals should be allowed to gamble in the casino, namely on similar terms to those granted to Singapore’s casinos by the Singapore government.

Singapore imposes on Singapore citizens and permanent residents a statutory entry levy of either SGD100 (US$73.50) for 24-hour access, or SGD2,000 for a year’s entry, but is content to give foreigners free access.

South Korea currently has 17 casinos, but the country’s nationals are only allowed to gamble at one of them – Kangwon Land in an upland area of Kangwon province.

Currently, Kangwon Land imposes a casino admission fee of KRW9,000 for locals. South Korea’s state auditor has recently urged the country’s government to introduce tighter rules to curb gambling addiction said to affect some South Korean nationals visiting the Kangwon Land casino resort, reported in July South Korean news agency Yonhap.

A number of investment analysts have noted that allowing locals to gamble in South Korean casinos other than Kangwon Land would require adjustments to the existing regulatory framework – even if there were some forms of social safeguard applied, such as an entry levy.

There are currently several new foreigners-only gaming projects under construction in South Korea. But those projects “will have difficulty achieving robust returns on investments” due to the inability to serve local gamblers, Fitch Ratings Inc said in a note in March.

Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Whatsapp Whatsapp LinkedIn Email Copy Link Print

Latest News

Studio City Finance completes US$165mln partial redemption of 2028 notes
July 22, 2026
Two Jeju-casino card dealers charged in relation to alleged fraud against Chinese gamblers
July 22, 2026
Cambodia casino regulator in prep work for nationwide casino evaluations: report
July 22, 2026

Most Popular

HeadlinesLatest NewsNewsletterNewsletter 2Trends & Tech

IGT ending its ETG business in 2027 as part of its focus on ‘core business priorities’

July 16, 2026
Latest NewsNewsletterNewsletter 5SingaporeTop of the deck

Some Singapore casino special employees suspected of gambling in breach of licensing conditions: Auditor-General

July 16, 2026
HeadlinesLatest NewsMacauNewsletterNewsletter 1

Macau’s VIP baccarat revenue down 2.6pct y-o-y in 2Q, slot GGR grows 17pct

July 16, 2026
HeadlinesLatest NewsNewsletterNewsletter 2Philippines

Alliance Global completes acquisition of Travellers Intl stake from Genting HK as first agreed in May 2023

July 16, 2026

Code of Ethics

Privacy Policy

Useful Links

Contact Us

Follow US
Copyright 2026 TEAM Publishing and Consultancy Ltd / All rights reserved
Sign up to our FREE Newsletter

Subscribe now and never miss our latest news!

Zero spam, unsubscribe at any time.